<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Treehugger  - Latest Comments in New High for Bottled Water</title><link>http://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://treehuggercomments.disqus.com/new_high_for_bottled_water/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:57:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: New High for Bottled Water</title><link>http://www.treehugger.com/green-food/new-high-for-bottled-water.html#comment-17453426</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Diatomic Oxygen" is just O2. 99% of the oxygen in our atmosphere exists as diatomic oxygen. It's the same thing as saying "it contains dissolved oxygen". Lol. people are fools.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Keith</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:57:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New High for Bottled Water</title><link>http://www.treehugger.com/green-food/new-high-for-bottled-water.html#comment-17453425</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Female readers should be proud of Treehugger for not gratuitously using pictures of scantily dressed female bodybuilders from the Oxyshot website."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why should just the female members be proud?  Isn't changing the face of advertising to be less objectifying something we should all strive for?  Should it only be women's responsibility?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Garrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:51:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New High for Bottled Water</title><link>http://www.treehugger.com/green-food/new-high-for-bottled-water.html#comment-17453424</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh man! What a rip-off. It says on the first page "It is a liquid oxygen supplement..." Ya, right. Liquid oxygen? If you drank liquid oxygen your face would freeze off. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think i'll just stop breathing and drink this stuff. Who needs that old-fashion air anyways. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">T</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:05:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New High for Bottled Water</title><link>http://www.treehugger.com/green-food/new-high-for-bottled-water.html#comment-17453423</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very silly indeed.   Should we assume that the bottlers actually supersaturate it with air or pure O2?  If it is indeed bubbly and under pressure, then the bottle would have to be thicker and stronger than normal water bottles  to handle the pressure, meaning the product is wasting still more plastic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If not bubbly, then it is easy to achieve the same thing by chilling your water bottle and shaking it up afterward to dissolve in additional air.  Oxygen solubility increases with a fall in temperature.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Laumer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 07:33:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New High for Bottled Water</title><link>http://www.treehugger.com/green-food/new-high-for-bottled-water.html#comment-17453422</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...u think it would be the same thing if i just toss some of &lt;a href="http://oxiclean.com/default2.asp" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://oxiclean.com/default2.asp"&gt; this stuff &lt;/a&gt;into my evian?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">littleCatalyst</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 07:14:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>